Can India play a role in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons? Today’s post highlights the differences in opinion amongst top Indian experts on issues of nuclear disarmament, India’s energy security, and Indian-Iranian relations.
India’s “Great Power Realists” and “Hyper-Nationalists” are ideologically in favor of nuclear deterrence as a means of maintaining international security. On the other hand, “Leftists” and “Neo-Nationalists” are staunchly opposed to any country acquiring nuclear weapons.
- Bharat Karnad, well-known security expert at New Delhi’s Center for Policy Research in New Delhi, believes that India is more secure because it has nuclear weapons. He does not support President Barack Obama’s call for global nuclear disarmament, and generally is less critical of the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran.
- Mani Shankar Aiyar, Member of the Indian Parliament, argues that universal, non-discriminatory and verifiable nuclear disarmament should be the most important item on the international community’s security agenda. He considers all nuclear-armed countries, from the United States to China to Iran, as threats to India’s security; even India itself should not have developed nuclear weapons.
For those opposed to a nuclear-armed Iran, what do they think should be done? “Liberal Globalists” and “Standard Nationalists” tend to support multilateral diplomacy over great power politics. (more…)
JAN
Bharat Karnad (Centre for Policy Research), Lalit Mansingh (Indian Foreign Service), Deepa Ollapally (GWU), TN Ninan (Business Standard), Mani Shankar Aiyar (Rajya Sabha) on Session 1 Panel: Indian Views on National Security and Defense
The Rising Powers Initiative, in partnership with the Center for New American Security (CNAS) hosted a conference on January 23 and 24 in Washington, D.C. entitled, “India as a Global Power: Contending Views from India.” The conference featured a panel of prominent Indian guests. The delegation included Mani Shankar Aiyar, Member of Indian Parliament, Rajya Sabha (Council of States); Bharat Karnad, Research Professor in National Security Studies, Centre for Policy Research; Lalit Mansingh, Former Foreign Secretary of India and Ambassador to the United States; and TN Ninan, Chairman and Chief Editor of the Business Standard.
The morning of January 23 included two sessions on Indian Views on National Security and Defense and Indian Views on Economics, International Institutions, and Transnational Issues. The first panel, chaired by co-PI Deepa Ollapally, elicited the Indians’ diverging views on national security and defense topics. Specifically, panelists debated Indian foreign policy on Pakistan, China, the South China Sea, Afghanistan, and Iran. (more…)
Continue Reading →JAN
On January 14, Taiwan’s voters elected incumbent President Ma Ying-jeou to a second term in office, while also giving his ruling Nationalist Party (KMT) a legislative majority. In this post, we highlight Chinese, Indian and Japanese commentaries on the implications of this election for cross-strait relations and regional politics.
CHINA
The party-owned press hailed Ma’s electoral victory as one more step closer toward political negotiations with Taiwan:
- The People’s Daily: “The concept of the peaceful development in relations between the two sides across the Taiwan Strait is more deeply rooted….According to the facts, no one can say “no” to peace, no one can refuse negotiations, and no one is willing to close the door of exchange and cooperation, and mutual benefit.”
- Taking note of the intense interest in Taiwan’s election amongst Chinese netizens, the Global Times emphasized the importance of national unity and explained that “systems designed for modern countries are not suitable for gigantic countries like China.”
INDIA
Indian commentaries focused on the opportunity to expand India’s economic relations with Taiwan, with references to geopolitical competition with China:
- Editorial by The Times of India: “Rich Taiwanese investors are looking for opportunities abroad – which China is capitalising aggressively on. Yet Taiwan doesn`t get much foreign policy attention from New Delhi. It remains a blind spot in India`s `Look East` policy, owing perhaps to some combination of India`s fear of offending China and the [Ministry of External Affairs'] terminal caution.”
- Nitin Pai writes in the Business Standard: “India faces a dilemma. On the one hand, the geopolitical stability suggested by a KMT government means greater economic opportunities for India to engage Taiwan. …On the other hand, a Beijing less preoccupied with issues in its backyard will find it easier to project power elsewhere, including against India. …Unless New Delhi uses the space created by Saturday’s elections to rapidly scale up economic ties, India will have little upside from Ma’s success.”
JAPAN
Japanese newspapers from different ends of the political spectrum converged in their skepticism that Ma’s victory boded more stable cross-strait relations:
- Editorial by the conservative Yomiuri Shimbun: “Of concern is to what extent China and Taiwan can move beyond the focus on economic relations and become closer politically. …A hastily forged political relationship with China would cause instability in Taiwan, thereby leading to cross-strait tension….An emergency across the Strait of Taiwan could escalate and endanger the security of Japan. We hope that Ma will steer his administration with discretion.”
- Editorial by the liberal-leaning Asahi Shimbun: “China still keeps ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan and is expanding its naval power around the island. The current stability in Sino-Taiwanese relations is as fragile as a glass sculpture and far from what constitutes true peace.” In the same editorial, the paper also urged a strengthening of Japan-Taiwan ties through measures such as the signing of a free trade agreement.
JAN
